• Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 days ago

    Only if you take it literally and I don’t think it was intended to be taken that way.

    • @crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 days ago

      All songs should be taken literally, which is why I eat love and prayers, and have a restraining order against me for trying to drag Hozier into a church at knifepoint.

    • @eronth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      105 days ago

      Either interpretation is valid, though. Either one is an absurd amount of gifts, I would not put it past the gifter to have made an extravagant display of re-giving the stuff from days before each day.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 days ago

      I’d be interested if this sort of exaggeration humor was common in Victorian England. Giving them all those things each day has a very “Lucy and Ethel at the chocolate factory” vibe that would be very amusing after a wassail or two.

    • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 days ago

      “on the second day of Christmas my true love gave to me, two turtle doves and a partridge in a pear tree.”

      It takes a bit of mental gymnastics to assert that on the second day of Christmas he did not send two turtle doves and a partridge in a pear tree.

      If I said yesterday I gave my friend a pork pie and today I gave my friend some spaghetti and a pork pie, you would not come to the conclusion that my friend did not receive a second pork pie.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 days ago

        I’d say it depends on whether you were singing it to me or not. Songs kind of have to keep these things brief a lot of the time. Also, the lyrics of this song don’t make much sense to begin with. 🤷